Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!pilchuck!amc-gw!sumax!halcyon!grendel
From: halcyon!grendel@sumax.seattleu.edu (Grendel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.misc
Subject: Re: Coherent Vs. Minix
Message-ID: <82q9u3w163w@halcyon.uucp>
Date: 4 Jan 91 08:35:42 GMT
References: <19954@netcom.UUCP>
Organization: The 23:00 News - +1 206 292.9048
Lines: 16

feustel@netcom.UUCP (David Feustel) writes:

> A coherent Minix386 is the best system for intuitively obvious reasons.
> -- 
> David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631
> EMAIL: netcom.uucp

Isn't it sort of a one or the other choice? =) Doesn't Minix have a 64k 
limit on executables like Coherent does? Which is better? What are the 
plusses and minuses of each?

*----------------------------------------------------------------------*
* Grendel, SysOp of The Sacred Grove Bulletin Board System             *
*          The Pagan and Magic BBS for the Pacific Northwest           *
*          (206)634-1980  Seattle WA                                   *
*----------------------------------------------------------------------*