Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf!cat!orfeo!jrix!joachim From: joachim@jrix.radig.de (Joachim Riedel) Newsgroups: comp.os.misc Subject: Re: Coherent Vs. Minix Message-ID: <1991Jan5.121538.218@jrix.radig.de> Date: 5 Jan 91 12:15:38 GMT References: <19954@netcom.UUCP> <82q9u3w163w@halcyon.uucp> Organization: Joachim Riedel, Offenbach, West Germany Lines: 35 halcyon!grendel@sumax.seattleu.edu (Grendel) writes: >Isn't it sort of a one or the other choice? =) Doesn't Minix have a 64k >limit on executables like Coherent does? Which is better? What are the >plusses and minuses of each? I think it's a question of your experience with UNIX and C-Programming. Coherent is much easier to use and install (Minix-Users, don't beat me). You have a lot of utilities now and don't have to wait until someone posts them to a newsgroup. Also some of the more interesting PC-Minix-Utilities like WMAIL 3.63 (Thanks to the author, it works well), CLAM-Shell (I use 1.4.1) and the MINIX-UUCP-Utilities are working with a handful modifications under Coherent. If you want a UNIX to work with I would prefer Coherent. If you want to learn something about the internal structure of a UNIX-like operating system I would prefer MINIX. One of the advantages of MINIX is the source code. So you could modify the utilities for your needs. I prefer Coherent. I needed 30 Minutes to get it work. Another 30 Minutes to get a UUCP-Connection to my 2. System running 386/ix. One year ago a friend of mine bought Minix, had a lot of difficulties to install it and now is also an satisfied Coherent User. You should post your question also to comp.os.minix. Here are too much Coherent users. Joachim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Joachim Riedel joachim@jrix.radig.de Geschwister-Scholl-Strasse 48 D-6050 Offenbach am Main Tel. +49 69 85 62 25 ----------------------------------------------------------------------