Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!crackers!m2c!ulowell!dino!reichert From: reichert@dino.ulowell.edu (Bastard) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc Subject: Re: Help in adding a new drive? Message-ID: <1688@ulowell.ulowell.edu> Date: 8 Jan 91 03:49:39 GMT References: <90365.230354G22QC@CUNYVM.BITNET> <1991Jan2.052119.14061@cs.uoregon.edu> Sender: news@ulowell.ulowell.edu Organization: University of Lowell, CPE Lines: 51 In article <1991Jan2.052119.14061@cs.uoregon.edu> santeew@cs.uoregon.edu (John Wes Santee) writes: >In article <90365.230354G22QC@CUNYVM.BITNET> G22QC@CUNYVM writes: >>My friend wanted to use 3.5 disks, so he bought a 3.5" floppy drive >>His computer is XT. After everything was set up, he couldn't get >>his new drive working. Here is what he has and what he has done: >> >> (many woes about trying an alternate device driver) >>********* > >Concerning your friend who has just purchased the 3.5" drive. > >If your friend is running a true XT, then he/she is looking at quite a bit >more money to get the drive to work. There are basically two things wrong >with your current configuration. > > (warnings about hardware/software problems) I myself have successfully installed a 3.5" on an turbo XT. In your warning made an invalid assumption: this person may only be interested in using the low-density (720k) format of the drive. The only glitch I ran into in dealing with the installation was that I was some non-IBM clone of MS-DOS 3.xx, and could not get a device set up with the correct parameters. Once I got my hands on a true-blue IBM version of 3.3, it worked out quite well - with a kludge: I wanted the 3.5" drive as drive A. Unfortunately, because of the way MS-DOS installs its device drivers, I had to set up the driver as an additional drive. What I ended up with as logical devices: A: could read the 3.5" as 720K, but could only write as 360k B: a 360k 5" disk C: my primary 32M hard drive partition D: the leftover 18M E: could read/write the 3.5" disk at 720k. It looks strange, I admit, but it allowed me to boot off of a 720k floppy. I could have used subst to rename E: to A:, but I had some uses for the doubly- named drive: I could pull off some weird copy schemes by convincing the system that I was using two separate drives, I eliminated the prompt normally associated with 'copy a:file a:file2' by being able to use a: and e:, which allowed for more autonomy in a batch file. driver to bastard@dragon.cpe.ulowell.cpu Brian (you Bastard) Reichert USnail: 85 Gershom Ave. #2 Lowell, MA 01854 "Intel architecture: the left hand path"