Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!well.UUCP!infopath From: infopath@well.UUCP ("Jay W. Melvin") Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: ICMP HOST_UNREACH Param: 1777 Message-ID: <9101012157.AA06468@well.sf.ca.us> Date: 1 Jan 91 21:57:11 GMT Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 45 Greetings, and thanks in advance to anyone willing and able to address this question. BACKGROUND: I am implementing ICMP for the first time and need clarification on the topic of Error_to_Source messages. ISSUE: MIL-STD 1777, Reassembling state decision table (pg. 1-119). The test "Where_to?" (pg. 1-126) tests the following to determine if the datagram is "destined for this site": 1. Datagram options for completion of source route address visits, 2. Datagram destination address for identity with this host's id. If either test fails, the decision table specifies that the HOST_UNREACH parameter should be passed to the Error_to_Source routine (pg. 1-131). PROBLEM 1: The Error_to_Source routine does not accept the HOST_UNREACH parameter. Instead, it accepts the PROTOCOL_UNREACH parameter, which has not been tested for by "Where_to?". PROBLEM 2: Consulting RFC 792 (pg. 5) deepens the apparent inconsistency by stating that the HOST_UNREACH parameter is generated by gateways, not hosts. Additionally, D. P. Sidhu's execllent RFC 963 (pg. 16) reinforces the PROTOCOL_UNREACH parameter by mentioning it in reference to another issue, but does not cite it as a problem in itself. QUESTIONS: Is there really an inconsistency here, or have I missed something? What information does the Internet Community expect the HOST_UNREACH ICMP message to communicate? Is it actually acceptable for a host to issue the HOST_UNREACH message under the conditions described above? Is there a discussion in the ICMP literature which would clarify the usage of the HOST_UNREACH parameter, since it appears to be the correct parameter to expect from a failed "Where_to?" test in a host environment. Many thanks, Linda Melvin Senior programmer infoPATH Communications Software Services, La Honda, CA infopath@well.com.sf.ca.us P.S. This is also my first attempt to use the TCP-IP forum. Please advise if I've not done it correctly.