Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains:561 comp.mail.uucp:5702 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!bu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!fuug!kth.se!perand From: perand@admin.kth.se (Per Andersson) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains,comp.mail.uucp,sublink.usenet Subject: Re: UKC and mail prices Message-ID: <1991Jan4.232355.3276@kth.se> Date: 4 Jan 91 23:23:55 GMT References: <1533@tharr.UUCP> <1990Dec23.222645.13580@trevan.uucp> <1146@otello.sublink.org> Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 20 In article <1146@otello.sublink.org> venta@otello.sublink.org (Paolo Ventafridda) writes: >It would be much,much, much more better if eunet's fees would >consider 'low cost' sites, i.e. sites paying for their own trafic >at a reasonable cost, without those high yearly fees.. Well, in Sweden, which IS part of europe, the fee is 1000 SKr/year this is something like 120 british pounds or 160 american dollars, and I really don't think that is very expensive. This also makes you member of the swedish unix users group. Tell us what you think is expensive, instead of just claiming 'it is', please. As for Pier-Carlo, he tends to think UK is all there is in europe, and apply the UK mess on all the other countries too. Hell, even Germany doesn't have as big a mess as the UK does anymore. Lets hope the UK commercial internet goes well, and that the UK mail problems get solved. If they can cooperate on using a .gb domain, and gatewaying internet mail/ uucp mail, a lot has been won. As for .uk, well, see you later alligator. -- Per Andersson (perand@admin.kth.se, perand@stacken.kth.se) Trying a new job at Bofors Electronics, still reading news at the Royal Institute of Technology Time, got the time tick tick tickin' in my head - Joe Jackson