Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!ucsd!ucbvax!TRANSARC.COM!Craig_Everhart
From: Craig_Everhart@TRANSARC.COM
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: WWV vs. The Naval Observatory Clock -- Who's Right ?
Message-ID: <8bVAYvz0BwwO5AC6Vm@transarc.com>
Date: 4 Jan 91 18:28:11 GMT
References: <9101040545.AA06971@suned1.Nswses.Navy.Mil>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8

While I fear to comment on this sort of thing with real Wizards
listening, I'd venture to say that the two sources account for the
to-date accumulation of leap seconds differently.  One source ignores
them, the other includes them.

Have I made a fool of myself now?

		Craig