Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!gatech!uflorida!ufqtp!bernhold
From: bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu (David E. Bernholdt)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: WWV vs. The Naval Observatory Clock -- Who's Right ?
Message-ID: <1227@orange19.qtp.ufl.edu>
Date: 5 Jan 91 16:06:10 GMT
References: <63354@petro.UUCP> <-286639992@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com>
Reply-To: bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu (David E. Bernholdt)
Organization: University of Florida Quantum Theory Project
Lines: 14

In article <-286639992@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com> swh@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com (Steve Harrold) writes:
>Re: Naval Observatory time
>
>The program that did the dialup reported a 0.07 second delay for the
>round-trip signal propogation, so I have difficulty believing that a delay
>of 12 seconds is due to networking/routing behaviour.

Has anyone considered the possibility that they may be reporting
_different_ times -- for example sidereal versus solar?
-- 
David Bernholdt			bernhold@qtp.ufl.edu
Quantum Theory Project		bernhold@ufpine.bitnet
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL  32611		904/392 6365