Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!frith!dailey
From: dailey@frith.uucp (Chris Dailey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Commodore Research and Development.
Message-ID: <1991Jan3.193503.6093@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
Date: 3 Jan 91 19:35:03 GMT
References: <1991Jan3.003449.1@ccvax.iastate.edu>
Sender: news@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu
Organization: Michigan State University
Lines: 19

In article <1991Jan3.003449.1@ccvax.iastate.edu> taab5@ccvax.iastate.edu writes:
>
>   I would seriously like someone to tell me why, over the past few years,
>Commodore's research and development has become very, very lax.  To prove
>my point I would like to present six cases in which Commodore hardware R&D
>has fallen well behind the rest of the industry -- in some cases two or
>three generations behind.

Uh-oh, I guess it's that time of year again.  Time to hit the 'K'
key.  ;=|

>    AMIGA -- YESTERDAY'S TECHNOLOGY, FOREVER!!!
>                                   -MB-

--
Chris Dailey   dailey@(frith.egr|cpsin.cps).msu.edu
BRD += DDR;
DDR = NULL;
num_countries --;