Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!svin02!eba!wjw
From: wjw@eba.eb.ele.tue.nl (Willem Jan Withagen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: Why do I need a "sfcb hash table mutex lock"?
Keywords: mutex lock, patch 139
Message-ID: <1021@eba.eb.ele.tue.nl>
Date: 2 Jan 91 16:32:30 GMT
References: <9012280914.AA03633@duc220.uni-duisburg.de>
Sender: news@eb.ele.tue.nl (The News system)
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lines: 17

In article <9012280914.AA03633@duc220.uni-duisburg.de> hj412fr@duc220.uni-duisburg.de (Martin Anantharaman) writes:
>We are having serious problems with a DN3550 under SR10.2 and the
>	
>	AND, (here comes...) at some stage the following message appears in the
>	DM ouput pad: "unable to obtain sfcb hash table mutex lock from (stream
>	manager/sfcb)" 

This is a know bug, and it has a patch, no 139.
It worked for us.

Ciao,
	Willem Jan Withagen

Eindhoven University of Technology   DomainName:  wjw@eb.ele.tue.nl    
Digital Systems Group, Room EH 10.10 BITNET: ELEBWJ@HEITUE5.BITNET
P.O. 513                             Tel: +31-40-473401
5600 MB Eindhoven                    The Netherlands