Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: ifar355@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (David H. Huang)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: resolution
Message-ID: <42216@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 8 Jan 91 00:36:20 GMT
References: <266@generic.UUCP> <14771@smoke.brl.mil>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: ifar355@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (David H. Huang)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 17

In article <14771@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>In article <266@generic.UUCP> ericmcg@pnet91.cts.com (Eric Mcgillicuddy) writes:
>>VGA has a 320x 200 resolution (with 256 colours no less!).
      ^^^^^
>
>Wrong.  I just got through using a state-of-the-art PC/AT clone these past
>few weeks, and IBM VGA is around 640x480 (exact details fuzzy since I was
>using one of the "extended" VGA cards that supported up to 1024x860).

Wrong yourself. VGA does have a 320x200x256 mode. True, it does have a 640x480
mode, but Eric never said that it didn't...

-- 
David Huang                                 |
Internet: ifar355@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu        |     "My ganglion is stuck in
UUCP: ...!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu!ifar355 |      a piece of chewing gum!"
America Online: DrWho29                     |