Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!cmm1 From: cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Christopher M Mauritz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: TT compiler (really Desktop (again)) Message-ID: <1991Jan4.143140.16251@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 4 Jan 91 14:31:40 GMT References: <1990Dec26.071538.13440@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <4135@uniol.UUCP> Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News) Organization: Columbia University Lines: 32 In article <4135@uniol.UUCP> Frank.Moehle@arbi.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de (Frank Moehle) writes: >klamer@mi.eltn.utwente.nl (Klamer Schutte -- Universiteit Twente) writes: > >>ens@ccu.umanitoba.ca writes: > >>>Here's a vote for releasing a RAM based version of the new desktop >>>for ST's so all the ataris in our lab work the same way. > >>>Werner Ens > >>Here is another vote for a <1040 - runnable> version of the new desktop > >>Klamer. > >>(Atari corp., are you listening? ) > >This is another vote for a HD-booteable version, >RAM usage is less important With 1 meg SIMMs at about $30/meg now, I would agree with the above. RAM usage isn't as important as the addition of the newer (hopefully less buggy) features. Cheers, Chris ------------------------------+--------------------------- Chris Mauritz |D{r det finns en |l, finns cmm1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu |det en plan! (c)All rights reserved. | Send flames to /dev/null | ------------------------------+---------------------------