Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.misc:7237 comp.sys.mac.hardware:7713 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!unhd!sjm From: sjm@uunet!unhd (Scott J Mccue) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: Soft PC vs. PC boards? Keywords: soft pc, pc boards, question Message-ID: <1991Jan4.164932.18227@uunet!unhd> Date: 4 Jan 91 16:49:32 GMT References: <1990Dec31.204024.3358@oracle.com> <1991Jan3.224414.22015@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Reply-To: sjm@unhd.UUCP (Scott J Mccue) Organization: Marine Systems Engineering Lab Lines: 61 In article <1991Jan3.224414.22015@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> kyt@cunixd.cc.columbia.edu (Kok Yong Tan) writes: >In article <1990Dec31.204024.3358@oracle.com> etileniu@oracle.COM (Eric Tilenius) writes: >>Q: Which is better (I leave the word open for interpretation) - Soft PC with >> the EGA/AT option or one of those PC cards? > The advantage with Soft PC with the EGA/At option, I'm told, >is that it actually emulates everything, color graphics and all. The only ^^^^^^^^^^ I don't believe this is quite true. Because of the nature of the mac serial ports, SoftPC can't fully emulate a PC serial port. The exact limitations I've forgotten, and may even have been eliminated with the most recent version(I've got 1.4), but I think it probably was as solved as it was going to get. This has interfered with my use of a specific device, but I've also used SoftPC with a Hayes-compatible modem and a telecomm program and it worked fine. My macII was limited to 1200 baud, I believe. Another not-so-wonderful thing is printing with SoftPC. I will sometimes lose pages. This wasn't a problem with my Imagewriter II w/ Apple driver, but it is a problem with my Deskwriter with a third party driver. Otherwise, the emulation is marvelous. Even the local PC heads are impressed. >problem is that it's as slow as the hills. You need a IIfx to get any decent >speed out of it. I use SoftPC EGA/AT on a Mac II and would certainly like it to be faster. It's fine for almost everything except compiling, which I'm doing a lot of right now. For that, I will often move my books and butt to an AT elsewhere in order to avoid waiting several minutes to compile a few thousand lines. I just performed a Norton SI (system info) to get the performance of the EGA/AT module relative to an XT. Here are the numbers: Computing Index: 2.6 Disk Index: 15.8 Performance Index: 7.0 Again, on a Mac II. I guess another spot that is slow is graphics. I tried using a game called Attack Sub 688, but it was so slow that playing was basically out of the question. I also played the GNU version of Tetris. This was ok, but speed (lack thereof) was a factor in playing the game and I gave it up. I've taken some steps to improve speed. One was to install a screen device driver that will improve performance by around a factor of two. That works fine. Another was to order another 4 Mbytes of memory (at these wonderfully low prices) so that I could try installing a stripped SoftPC partition with compiler into a mac ramdisk. I haven't received the memory yet so I don't know how well this will work. >>Q: Has anyone tried running Microsoft Windows on a Mac either with the hdwr >> boards or with Soft PC? Is it workable? I haven't tried this for three reasons. The first is that I think SoftPC will be too slow to use Windows 3. The second is that I'm not impressed with the usefulness of Windows on a 286. The third is that it takes far too much room as compared to the space I have. The bottom line, for me, is price. I spent $350 on SoftPC and can do virtually any PC based chore. I have to do this often, so it was $350 well spent. I don't think I would feel the same if I'd spent the extra for the Orange Micro board. And when the speed is inadequate, I move to a machine that is adequate. I don't do this nearly so often as before I got SoftPC, however. I like that, and I like SoftPC. sjm@unhd.unh.edu (Scott McCue) sjm@msel.unh.edu