Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!dali.cs.montana.edu!milton!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!reed!glacier!busker!f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG!daven
From: daven@f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG (daven)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: A/UX on Mac : Need an overview
Message-ID: <683.2783DF47@busker.fidonet.org>
Date: 28 Dec 90 04:52:40 GMT
Sender: ufgate@busker.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:226/20 - cmhGate UF Gateway, Columbus OH
Lines: 59

Reply-To: daven@svc.portal.com

In article <19450@netcom.UUCP> lpendley@netcom.UUCP (Lou Pendley) writes:
>i am looking into the Mac, as a new world to venture into.  i 
>would greatly appreciate any info on Unix running on the Mac.  i
>need to know basically at least the following questions:
>
>a)  is it the same look and feel of the typical Mac

Very much so! Mac applications still look like Mac applications. The
Finder running ontop of A/UX makes UNIX partitions look like regular
Mac partitions. You can of course bring up a shell with a command
line interface, but you still have a Mac-like window the shell lives
in. Also, many UNIX commands have "Commando" interfaces. This means
you get a window that shows all or most of the commands options and
switches. I find this much easier for issuing commands that I'm not
very familiar with. If you've ever used Commando under MPW, you'll
know what A/UX's Commando is like.

>b)  must you purchase special Mac software that only runs under A/UX

I suppose some companies do this, but if the software expects to run
under System 7.0, chances are it will run under A/UX without any
modification. For example, our program MicroPhone II v3.0 runs just
fine under A/UX. We don't sell a special version just for A/UX.

>c)  does anybody make software to run on A/UX

Most people make software that is compatible with A/UX, but doesn't
take special advantage of A/UX. These packages must run in the
MultiFinder process of A/UX. Apple is encouraging developers to
write software for A/UX that uses the Mac Toolbox, but runs as
a seperate process rather than a sub-process of MultiFinder. How
much software of this type exists I can't guess at.

>d)  has the industry accepted it as a viable Unix platform

I don't really know. I do know that I like the Mac Interface running
on A/UX. I like it better than NeXTStep or OpenLook. I also like
the fact that Apple has done a better job at hiding UNIX than NeXT
has. There is no Commando like feature under NeXTStep that I know
of, and I hate looking up command line options. I hate command lines
period! With A/UX I see the command line far less often that with
NeXTStep.



-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Dave Newman              I  daven@svc.portal.com        I  AppleLink: D0025
   Sofware Ventures Corp.   I  AOL: MicroPhone             I  CIS: 76004,2161
   Berkeley, CA  94705      I  WELL: tinman@well.sf.ca.us  I  (415) 644-3232

 + Organization: Software Ventures

--  
daven - via FidoNet node 1:105/14
    UUCP: ...!{uunet!glacier, ..reed.bitnet}!busker!226!20!daven
INTERNET: daven@f20.n226.z1.FIDONET.ORG