Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!basset.utah.edu!haas
From: haas%basset.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Walt Haas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
Subject: Re: Request for IPX encapsulation in TCP/IP status
Message-ID: <1991Jan3.081729.23077@hellgate.utah.edu>
Date: 3 Jan 91 15:17:29 GMT
References: <35251@netnews.upenn.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 10

In article <35251@netnews.upenn.edu> tony@scotty.dccs.upenn.edu (Anthony Olejnik) writes:
>...What is the status for the encapsulation of IPX packets in TCP/IP packets?
>...I would like to know since we have a fairly large bridged ethernet network
>that runs mainly TCP/IP.  This network is starting to be subnetted and
>IP routers (which will not pass IPX packets) are starting to be deployed.

Where did you find a router that won't pass IPX?  Our ciscos route it OR
bridge it.  Most other brands do at least one or the other.

-- Walt Haas    haas@ski.utah.edu