Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!cluster!necisa!boyd
From: boyd@necisa.ho.necisa.oz.au (Boyd Roberts)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: Preventing date rollback
Message-ID: <1976@necisa.ho.necisa.oz.au>
Date: 3 Jan 91 00:00:10 GMT
References: <RICHARD.90Dec3143525@dataspan.dataspan.UUCP> <292@bria.AIX>
Distribution: comp
Organization: NEC Information Systems Australia Pty. Ltd.
Lines: 14

In article <292@bria.AIX> mike@bria.AIX (Mike Stefanik/78125) writes:
>
> [ stuff about re-writting a string in an executable ]
>
>The above is preferable over using inode information such as access time,
>because that can easily be fudged.
>

And what stops me from re-writing the string in the executable?


Boyd Roberts			boyd@necisa.ho.necisa.oz.au

``When the going gets wierd, the weird turn pro...''