Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!pacbell.com!ames!ncar!csn!news
From: skwu@boulder.Colorado.EDU (WU SHI-KUEI)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: using awk with records that have over 100 fields
Keywords: awk
Message-ID: <1991Jan2.164006.24557@csn.org>
Date: 2 Jan 91 16:40:06 GMT
References: <1560@manta.NOSC.MIL> <1990Dec31.200723.7929@convex.com> <1991Jan1.190259.868@csn.org> <1991Jan02.133911.24428@convex.com>
Sender: news@csn.org
Reply-To: skwu@spot.Colorado.EDU (WU SHI-KUEI)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 24
Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu

In article <1991Jan02.133911.24428@convex.com> tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) writes:
.....quoting my posting, which quoted his posting, and then continues....
>While for this particular application, it may well be that this solution
>suffices, there remain all kinds of internal limits you're going to run into
>with awk.......
>
>Although perl isn't really new anymore, it's still generally perceived to
>be so, and the resistance to new, useful tools in the community is so high
>that some people will insist on shooting themselves in the foot using old,
>limited (and even brain-damaged) software for years in the future.....
......
>While the desire to embrace better
>technology may be somewhat higher amongst computer users than in the
>general populace, there will always be some who wish to live (if you can
>call that living) in a totally static environment where nothing ever
>changes, where no improvement is ever radically different from previous
>practice, and where the JCL scripts from 25 years ago still function.
........
>
Different problems are often best solved by employing
>different tools, even if perl is the Swiss army chainsaw of UNIX.  

Has it ever struck you that perl scripts and JCL code are painfully similar
precisely because perl is a Swiss army chainsaw?