Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!svin02!debra
From: debra@svin02.info.win.tue.nl (Paul de Bra)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: '386 Unix Wars
Keywords: sco unix interactive wars
Message-ID: <1659@svin02.info.win.tue.nl>
Date: 3 Jan 91 15:06:39 GMT
References: <2812@cirrusl.UUCP> <350@metran.UUCP> <94408977@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lines: 21

In article <94408977@bfmny0.BFM.COM> tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes:
>...
>Anyway, memory is so damn cheap these days.  My only beef is that, for a
>UNIX release packing so many additional files, SVR4/386 doesn't have better
>support for huge ESDI disks.  It chafes to have to throw away 100MB of
>my Maxtor just to keep upder 1024 cylinders.  I would like to see this
>addressed in a future rev.

The 1024 cylinder limitation is not an AT&T invention.
Complain to your vendor.
AT&T Unix sVr3.2 and sVr4.0 (at least the beta i have seen)
have no problems with drives with more than 1024 cylinders,
without the need for funny translation procedures.
I have used a CDC Wren V (383H) with 1224 cylinders and an
Adaptec 2322 controller with both versions of Unix and never had
any problem. ISC 2.0.1 (but i believe later versions have the same
problem) decided (wrongly!) that my system would not support more
than 1024 cylinders and would not let me access the last 200 cylinders.

Paul.
(debra@research.att.com, debra@win.tue.nl)