Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!stl!robobar!ronald
From: ronald@robobar.co.uk (Ronald S H Khoo)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: Xenix files..
Message-ID: <1991Jan7.102336.8266@robobar.co.uk>
Date: 7 Jan 91 10:23:36 GMT
References: <1991Jan2.200940.3320@bbt.se> <1991Jan04.045614.13386@kithrup.COM> <1991Jan6.095033.3709@bbt.se>
Organization: Robobar Ltd., Perivale, Middx., ENGLAND.
Lines: 21

pgd@bbt.se writes:

> [ sef@kithrup.com wrote ]
> >Although it is possible to reverse engineer the stuff necessary for a shared
> >library, it does not sound as if you have done it.

> I am sorry to disappoint you, but that is exactly what I have
> done.

Are you going to share this with us ?  If whoever it is that promised us a
X server for Xenix fulfils his promise, this sounds like a *brilliant*
way to run X with Xenix.  And without having to buy the development system
too!  Wow.  Sounds good to me if it's true!

But I remember that you said something about SCO's linker not coping with
the absolute jumps.  How did you work around that problem ?

(Sean, would you be prepared to look at and help shake down pgd's work
 if he makes it available ?)
-- 
ronald@robobar.co.uk +44 81 991 1142 (O) +44 71 229 7741 (H)