Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!ico!attc!marbru
From: marbru@attc.UUCP (Martin Brunecky)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X{Put,Get}Scanline (was Re: XImages)
Message-ID: <949@attc.UUCP>
Date: 2 Jan 91 19:15:35 GMT
References: <935@attc.UUCP> <9012172158.AA07950@expire.lcs.mit.edu> <938@attc.UUCP> <1990Dec19.225710.4008@dsd.es.com> <3391@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>
Reply-To: marbru@auto-trol.UUCP (Martin Brunecky)
Organization: Auto-trol Technology, Denver
Lines: 21

In article <3391@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> etaylor@wilkins.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu (Eric Taylor) writes:
>X{PutGet}ScanLine sounds like one of the best ideas I have heard
>in a while concerning images.  This would be a VERY good way to
>speed up imaging applications without having to sacrifice 
>generality for different depths.

   And it can be added to the XImage structure without any loss
   of (upwards) compatibility.
   Is anybody willing to contribute the code (just re-working
   the existing one in XImgUtil.c) so that Bob would *consider*
   adding this to R5 ?
   Sorry - I have no time to do it right now .... I am way behing
   even on my patches to Xrm.c



-- 
=*= Opinions presented here are solely of my own and not those of Auto-trol =*=
Martin Brunecky                           {...}sunpeaks!auto-trol!marbru
(303) 252-2499                        (sometimes also:  marbru@auto-trol.COM )
Auto-trol Technology Corp. 12500 North Washington St., Denver, CO 80241-2404