Xref: utzoo sci.energy:3665 sci.electronics:16583 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!rochester!dietz From: dietz@cs.rochester.edu (Paul Dietz) Newsgroups: sci.energy,sci.electronics Subject: Re: solar cells Message-ID: <1991Jan1.185841.16857@cs.rochester.edu> Date: 1 Jan 91 18:58:41 GMT References: <939@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> <1990Dec29.063939.20478@zoo.toronto.edu> <1990Dec31.173248.24523@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <-BS^0H*@rpi.edu> Reply-To: dietz@cs.rochester.edu (Paul Dietz) Organization: University of Rochester Computer Science Dept Lines: 29 In article <-BS^0H*@rpi.edu> wrf@mab.ecse.rpi.edu (Wm Randolph Franklin) writes: >In article <1990Dec31.173248.24523@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> amirza@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (anmar mirza) writes: >>What is really good about passive solar heating and geothermal systems >>is that they *will* pay for themselves in savings compared to the old >>system. The turn around time can be as little as 10 years. >What interest rate does this assume? Does it take advantage of any tax >breaks (if there are any left)? Thanks. > >The reason I ask is that many "efficient" devices make no sense in my >home when interest is included. E.g., I take years to burn out a $1 >100W power 1700 lumen 1000 hour bulb. Some haven't burnt out since we >bought the house 8 years ago. A $10 fluorescent bulb would have to >contain a nuclear power source and provide the light free to be as >cheap if money costs 12%. You have to be really careful here. I suspect the *effective* interest rate you would pay is much, much less than 12%. Why? Two reasons: taxes and inflation. Unless you are careful, these effects might actually give you a negative effective interest rate. In contrast, the savings from personal capital investments like increased efficiency are tax-free (unless they increase your assessed property value), and are also inflation resistant, since energy prices will likely tend to rise with inflation, at least roughly. Paul F. Dietz dietz@cs.rochester.edu