Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!jarthur!ucivax!gateway
From: baranski@meridn.enet.dec.com (Jim Baranski)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: definitions
Message-ID: <9101072033.AA28213@easynet.crl.dec.com>
Date: 8 Jan 91 00:56:38 GMT
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 15
Approved: tittle@ics.uci.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: blanche.ics.uci.edu

In article <12916@scorn.sco.COM>, timr@sco.COM (Bad Hurts Value) writes...

"i don't expect the liberation of men to be on the feminist agenda.  i
don't think that i have an inalienable right to live in a separatist
household, or participate in any other womyn-space.  i don't expect
feminists to support my right to a men-only space, though i certainly
have a problem in respecting any bigot."

If feminists wish men's cooperation on their agenda, they should be
prepared to cooperate with men's agenda.  Or prehaps more accurately,
both sides must listen to each other and discuss reasonable
compromises if any headway is to be made at all other then setting
each side in opposition to each other.

Jim Baranski