Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!cognos!alzabo!andras
From: andras@alzabo.uucp (Andras Kovacs)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Re: How wrong is MS-DOS?
Message-ID: <1991Jan7.164531.11488@alzabo.uucp>
Date: 7 Jan 91 16:45:31 GMT
References: <1991Jan02.035501.9457@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> <14900021@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com>
Reply-To: andras@alzabo.UUCP (Andras Kovacs)
Organization: Brian's XENIXlings, Ottawa, Canada
Lines: 15

In article <14900021@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com> muyanja@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (bill muyanja) writes:
>> ... I cheerfully admit that DOS completely fails to handle more than 1MB of
>> RAM.  It's not perfect.
>   
>Not so! Windows 3.0, a *DOS* product, can allocate a 64MB glob of memory in
>386-enhanced mode.
>
>- bill

    Does it cost extra money or someone ships it bundled with DOS x.xx?!
  (When someone talks about DOS then the subject isn't Windows 3.0.)
-- 
Andras Kovacs       "Could somebody tell me what kind of a world we live in
andras@alzabo.UUCP   where a man dressed as a BAT gets all of my press..."
Nepean, Ont.                                               The Joker