Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!ncis.tis.llnl.gov!blackbird!lriggins
From: lriggins@blackbird.afit.af.mil (L. Maurice Riggins)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: v.32 recommendation needed (One that works!!)
Message-ID: <1873@blackbird.afit.af.mil>
Date: 15 Jan 91 04:10:08 GMT
References: <430@shograf.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Air Force Institute of Technology; WPAFB, OH
Lines: 18

In article <430@shograf.UUCP> jim@shograf.com (jim morris) writes:
>Can anyone recommend a "RELIABLE" V.32 compliant modem.

Here we are using UDS v3224's (v.32 MNP, no v.42) as dial-in/outs.  SOME
non-MNP 2400 buad modems can't stand to see their negotiation, but no problems
with 1200 or 9600 connects.

I also use a Hayes ULTRA stand-alone and regularly connect with v.32's, 2400
and 1200 baud non-EC modems, as well as a USR HST with v.42 (at 2400).

Neither of these experience carrier drop.  Check the values in the S9 and S10 
registers before giving up on the Prometheus.

-- 
Maurice      INTERNET:    lriggins@blackbird.afit.af.mil (129.92.1.2)

      Opinions expressed here do not reflect those of my employer nor
      constitute an official position of any U.S.Government agency.