Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: floyd@ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Interoffice Signalling
Message-ID: <15898@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 8 Jan 91 08:52:10 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: University of Alaska, Institute of Marine Science
Lines: 24
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 17, Message 9 of 9


In article <15850@accuvax.nwu.edu> floyd@ims.alaska.edu (Floyd
Davidson) writes:

>In article <15840@accuvax.nwu.edu> bill@toto.info.com (Bill Cerny)
>writes:

>>In the local switching environment, if two end offices are connected
>>by interoffice trunks, how many digits are passed between offices when
>>completing an interoffice call?  (assumptions: electronic offices,
>>inband signalling, same NPA, same telco)

>Because you specified the same NPA they would most likely pass only
>the last four digits.  But also it is unlikely that there would be two
>switches and only one NPA.

My statement above is a bit brain damaged.  I was thinking of office
codes, not area codes when I wrote that.  Guess I gotta stop posting
at 3 AM.


Floyd L. Davidson                                  floyd@ims.alaska.edu
Salcha, AK 99714                    paycheck connection to Alascom, Inc.
 When I speak for them, one of us will be *out* of business in a hurry.