Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: roger@wrq.com (Roger Fulton)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Misleading AT&T Advertising
Message-ID: <15908@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 8 Jan 91 21:43:44 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: Walker Richer & Quinn, Inc., Seattle, WA
Lines: 17
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 19, Message 4 of 9


In article <15367@accuvax.nwu.edu> John Higdon <john@bovine.ati.com>
writes:

<text deleted>

>Someone please tell me that readers of the Digest base purchasing
>decisions on price, service, quality, suitability for intended use,
>and value and not on what some ad agency produces to brainwash the
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>public.  Someone please tell me that.

Do you really mean to say that AT&T is not responsible for what "some
ad agency" produces for them?


Roger Fulton     roger@wrq.com