Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: jon_sree@world.std.com (Jon Sreekanth) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Pulse-Mode Frequencies? Message-ID: <15962@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 10 Jan 91 14:55:37 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 42 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 23, Message 6 of 6 In article <15852@accuvax.nwu.edu> mitel!Software!meier@uunet.uu.net (Rolf Meier) writes: Some fast operators are specified to work up to 20 pps. I have a Uniden phone that I bought around 1986, and it has a three position switch : DTMF, 10pps pulse, 20pps pulse. I've not had any problems using 20pps in CA and MA (but in well populated suburban areas). Who cares about dial pulsing any more anyway? I understand it's still widely used outside North America. On this topic, why do many voice mail and other phone operated services insist on users having DTMF phones ? Is it really hard to detect pulse mode digits? I can see that the low numbers might be a problem, (can't distinguish it from a noise pulse), but if one saw five to ten regularly spaced pulses, isn't that adequate for recognition? I've seen AT&T answering machines which say on the box that they work with pulse phones (at the remote end, for checking one's messages). I haven't played with them. Does anyone know how they work, or how reliable the detection is ? Regards, Jon Sreekanth Assabet Valley Microsystems Fax and PC products 346 Lincoln St #722, Marlboro, MA 01752 508-562-0722 jon_sree@world.std.com [Moderator's Note: The old Unitel (United Airlines) internal phone network was able to recognize pulse dialing on the in-dial to their call-extender here several years ago. Don't ask me how they did it. I did note at the time that tone signals were more reliable. PAT]