Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool2.mu.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: phil@wubios.wustl.edu (J. Philip Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Emergency Re-Routing
Message-ID: <15981@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 11 Jan 91 02:20:18 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 20
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 25, Message 8 of 9


> [Moderator's Note:
>.... Remember, for years prior to Sprint and MCI having
> their own complete network they both leased circuits from AT&T and
> from each other. 

This reminds me of a question that I have had for some time.  Does
AT&T now do the reverse?  One of the reasons that I ask, is that near
my house (in the 1900 block of Chouteau) is a bunker type building
which was (at least since the divesture) labeled as an AT&T facility.
A couple of years ago there was the laying of a major fiber cable
under major streets in St. Louis and leading to this facility.
Several months ago, I noticed that now the bunker is labeled as
belonging to Sprint.  What is going on here?


     J. Philip Miller, Professor, Division of Biostatistics, Box 8067
	 Washington University Medical School, St. Louis MO 63110
	     phil@wubios.WUstl.edu - Internet  (314) 362-3617
uunet!wuarchive!wubios!phil - UUCP (314)362-2693(FAX)  C90562JM@WUVMD - bitnet