Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:15301 comp.windows.x:31408
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!mintaka!spdcc!tauxersvilli!alphalpha!nazgul
From: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: NAPLPS interpreters?
Keywords: NAPLPS
Message-ID: <1991Jan10.002715.4539@alphalpha.com>
Date: 10 Jan 91 00:27:15 GMT
References: <1991Jan7.113439@rioja.ifs.umich.edu>
Organization: asi
Lines: 21

In article <1991Jan7.113439@rioja.ifs.umich.edu> ric@ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell) writes:
>Looking for pointers to UNIX-based NAPLPS interpreters,
>preferably ones based on the X Window System.
>
>The goal is to construct an UNIX/X11 interpreter for Prodigy(r).

That I'd love to see (well, second only to a BBS which supported
Prodigy protocol).  However I believe that Prodigy is a completely
home-grown protocol?  I know for certain that they are continually
enhancing it and adding new features.  Is it really based on NAPLPS?
Has anyone done any reverse engineering on it?

						-kee
-- 
Alfalfa Software, Inc.		|	motif-request@alfalfa.com
nazgul@alfalfa.com		|-----------------------------------
617/646-7703 (voice/fax)	|	Proline BBS: 617/641-3722

I'm not sure which upsets me more; that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.