Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!sun-barr!newstop!exodus!rbbb.Eng.Sun.COM!chased
From: chased@rbbb.Eng.Sun.COM (David Chase)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: class-sic. [Re: On whether C has ...]
Message-ID: <5692@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 11 Jan 91 02:07:59 GMT
References: <20021@yunexus.YorkU.CA> <24547:Jan822:05:4191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <20058@yunexus.YorkU.CA> <27942:Jan902:20:0791@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <27770.278aef90@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> <1991Jan10.185427.6416@dirtydog.ima.isc.com>
Sender: news@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Mt. View, Ca.
Lines: 13

karl@ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:
>kinnersley@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Bill Kinnersley) writes:
>>Never in my life have I seen two mathematicians spend more than five
>>seconds worrying about the "official" definition of anything.

>Apparently you haven't been following the "what is 0^0" thread in sci.math.

Do you have any evidence that the people arguing there are
mathematicians?  This is the net, after all.  "I'm not really a
doctor, but I play one on USENET."

David Chase
Sun Microsystems