Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!umich!sharkey!bnlux0!kushmer From: kushmer@bnlux0.bnl.gov (christopher kushmerick) Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal Subject: Re: Doubts on TP 6.0 updatating being worth the while Message-ID: <2403@bnlux0.bnl.gov> Date: 10 Jan 91 22:45:14 GMT References: <19416@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1991Jan9.194840.18614@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <1991Jan10.063046.9686@uwasa.fi> Organization: Brookhave National Lab, Upton, NY Lines: 33 In article <1991Jan10.063046.9686@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes: >In article <1991Jan9.194840.18614@en.ecn.purdue.edu> newlin@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Captain Kludge) writes: >: >> One issue that hasn't been mentioned is the fact that Borland has ... > >Fair enough. And what this also means is that 6.0 should be after >all be considered an just intermediate version and we can expect in >line the 5th upgrade with incompatible units. Why didn't they make >it Windows right away. Borland's upgrading tactics is beginning to >raise some aggravation, even for a TP fan, isn't it? It seems a bit like there is a split personality working there at Borland Central. Would the same brain that decided to include source level assembler in the pascal compiler -a logical and excellent progression from inline- also decide to burdon the users with Vision, the new layout of the editor, no simple color scheme for monochrome monitors etcetera? Today I got a letter from borland pushing the spread sheet, Quattro, for $95, thats 400 dollars off of the list price. Now we all know that list prices are a fraud to begin with. But for the manufacturer to sell something for 25% of the list price seems absurd. Who prey tell did the market study that concluded that the list price should be so high? I still like borland, but sometimes they make me wonder. -- Chris Kushmerick kushmer@bnlux0.bnl.gov <===Try this one first kushmerick@pofvax.sunysb.edu