Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news
From: mascio@convex.COM (John R.S. Mascio)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: Problem with Elm (s)ave function
Message-ID: <1991Jan09.194200.29149@convex.com>
Date: 9 Jan 91 19:42:00 GMT
References: <1103@pdxgate.UUCP>
Sender: news@convex.com (news access account)
Reply-To: mascio@convex.COM (John R.S. Mascio)
Distribution: na
Organization: Convex Computer Corporation; Richardson, TX
Lines: 17
Nntp-Posting-Host: concave.convex.com

In article <1103@pdxgate.UUCP> mauvais@psuorpn.cc.pdx.edu (Paul Mauvais) writes:
>
>A number of our users have come to me with a problem with the (s)ave function
>with Elm V2.3 PL9 (running on a Sequent S81, DYNIX 3.0.17.11).
>
>It seems that if the header is more than a simple from/to, then when you
>hit the s key to save, it gives you a segmentation violation and exits.
>
>There are a couple headers/messages that it does this on every time.
>One is included at the bottom of this letter.
>
>Anyone else run into this problem?

I think this is the same error my supervisor is running into.  I'm
trying to get more info myself.  We are using Elm V2.3 PL9 on a Convex
C-1, Convex UNIX 8.1.  If I come up with anything illuminating, I'll
post it.