Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!csn!boulder!bohemia!p11.f477.n104.z1.METRONET.ORG!Greg.Smith
From: Greg.Smith@p11.f477.n104.z1.METRONET.ORG (Greg Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Dr-dos (re: Which Dos Version?)
Message-ID: <68.278D5DE1@bohemia.metronet.org>
Date: 10 Jan 91 07:06:00 GMT
Sender: ufgate@bohemia.metronet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:104/477.11 - Jaguar's Networking, Denver CO
Lines: 26


In a message to All <08 Jan 91 00:50> Ramontante wrote:

 Ra> From: bobmon@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (RAMontante)

 Ra> | If you plan on using version 5.0, why not go ahead and get
 Ra> | Dr-Dos 5.0.  I am running it on my 20Mhz 286 and it works great.
 Ra> | I highly recommend it.  If not, go with 4.01, as you won't have
 Ra> | to re-partition the disk when 5.0 comes.

 Ra> Hmmm... any (pointers to) information about or descriptions of Dr-Dos?
 Ra> I've never heard of the product.

It is put out by Digital Reasearch Inc.  It is a os as is Ms or PC dos, and is fully compatible in every way I can think of.  It has many more commands than Dos 3.3 or 4.01.  It even lets you load 90% of it in high memory plus loading TSR's there.  Look in your favorite software store, they're sure to know about it.  I have 609k free for my programs and could have 620k free if that sounds good... :)

                                   Greg
--- XRS! 4.00DV
 * Origin: Reading this is pointless. (Quick 1:104/477.11)

--  
=============================================================================
Greg Smith - via MetroNet node 200:5000/301 
The Bohemia BBS System, Boulder Colorado (303)449-8946
UUCP:  Greg.Smith@p11.f477.n104.z1.METRONET.ORG
 or :  ...!boulder!bohemia.METRONET.ORG!1!104!477.11!Greg.Smith
=============================================================================