Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!hoss.unl.edu!ho
From: ho@hoss.unl.edu (Tiny Bubbles...)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: TurboC 2.0 & TurboC++: Speed and Debugger
Message-ID: <1991Jan09.190941.28544@hoss.unl.edu>
Date: 9 Jan 91 19:09:41 GMT
References: <1991Jan9.131031.21220@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Sender: news@hoss.unl.edu (Network News Administer)
Distribution: na
Organization: Daily Nebraskan, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Lines: 20

In <1991Jan9.131031.21220@sbcs.sunysb.edu> kroe@sbcs.sunysb.edu (KiYun Roe) writes:

>speed between TurboC 2.0 and TurboC++ when compiling C code using the
>command-line versions of the compilers?  I'm thinking of upgrading from
>TurboC Pro to TurboC++ Pro, but I only have an XT level system.  I

I want to know, too.  

My main reason is this:  there was some patch info for TC++ 1.01 that
was circulating earlier -- I believe it was a Borland "patch list" for
the bug-fix release -- which alluded to "improving performance on 286
systems."

That sounds pretty scary for us.  If they're trying to make it bearable 
on a *286*, imagine how it would feel on our humble XT's...
--
        ... Michael Ho, University of Nebraska
Internet: ho@hoss.unl.edu | "Mine... is the last voice that you will ever hear."
Disclaimer: Peons don't speak for bigwigs.