Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!samsung!spool2.mu.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!videovax!dougs From: dougs@videovax.tv.tek.com (Doug Stevens) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: TurboC and TurboC++ Summary: Much better development environment. Message-ID: <6261@videovax.tv.tek.com> Date: 11 Jan 91 01:45:11 GMT References: <350bahrd@yoda.byu.edu> Organization: Tektronix TV Measurement Systems, Beaverton OR Lines: 18 In article , hollen@megatek (Dion Hollenbeck) writes: > > ... I just talked to Borland > Customer Service about upgrading from TC to TC+ > and ... they informed me that I would have to PORT [my programs] ... > The price [$125] seemed a little steep to me since I need none of the > OOP capabilities of C++ ... I've ported a large application, and it took only a day; the only problem I ran into was an inherent problem in my code, which was unmasked by going to the new compiler. One recurring misconception about TC++ 1.0 is that it only adds C++ over the features of TC 2.0. I use TC++ 1.0 all the time now, and I do virtually NO C++ programming; what I got that was really valuable was a much improved development environment (multiple concurrent windows, a framework, mouse support, etc). The Borland marketeers should be playing up this facet. No connection with Borland other than as a very satisfied user.