Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool2.mu.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!uupsi!pbs.org!kellsworth From: kellsworth@pbs.org (Video Magician) Newsgroups: comp.os.os9 Subject: Re: 6502 or 65816 os9? Message-ID: <1991Jan12.085106.11318@pbs.org> Date: 12 Jan 91 13:51:06 GMT References: <1991Jan11.144935.15157@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1991Jan11.210804.14612@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> Organization: PBS:Public Broadcasting Service, Alexandria, VA Lines: 28 In article <1991Jan11.210804.14612@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu>, kdarling@hobbes.ncsu.edu (Kevin Darling) writes: > wogg0743@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (William Shakespeare) writes: >>Has there ever been a port of os-9 to run on the 6502 line of processors? > > Nope. OS-9 takes advantage of addressing modes capable of supporting > position-independent code.... modes which neither the 6502 nor 6800 have. > Upscale cpus like the 6809 and 680x0 do. It also relies a lot on having > index registers which are larger than the 6502's. Ummm, if one were > crazy, a person could create a linking loader for OS9, and perhaps come up > with a version... but it'd be more or less starting from scratch to do so. > And wouldn't have near the same power. > > Instead, a 6809 board running OS-9 was available at one time for the > Apple-II, and OS-9 was ported to the 6809 version of Commodore machines. > > best - kev Speaking of OS9 for Commodore machines, what about OS9 for the Amiga? I understand that there is a port under development Down Under in either Australia and/or New Zealand. Is there any word from Microware about working something out with Commodore? Such a combination would definitely make one magnificent machine! ------- Keith "Been OS9-ing for years!" Ellsworth Editor Public Broadcasting Service