Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!nosc!logicon.com!tots!tep
From: tep@tots.Logicon.COM (Tom Perrine)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: To Subnet or not to subnet?
Message-ID: <208@tots.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jan 91 01:49:19 GMT
References: <207@tots.UUCP> <1991Jan7.173554.11434@zoo.toronto.edu>
Reply-To: tep@tots.UUCP (Tom Perrine)
Organization: Logicon, Inc., San Diego, California
Lines: 27

Several days ago I sent a question regarding what to do about a
network number for our growing network. The options I listed were to
	1) subnet my existing class-C
	2) get additional class-C nets

The overwhelming response was choice 3! Of 10 responses, 8 suggested
that I what I really wanted was a class-B net, and most recommended
subnetting the thing as pseudo-class-C nets.

Thanks to all of the network wizards who replied:

dsinc.dsi.com!syd@ucsd.edu (Syd Weinstein)
barns@gateway.mitre.org (Bill Barns)
jnford@handlebar.weeg.uiowa.edu (Jay Ford)
uunet.UU.NET!delmarva!scoggin (John Scoggin)
brian@ucsd.EDU (Brian Kantor)
tecnet1.jcte.jcs.mil!kate
eng.xyplex.com!rlstewart (Bob Stewart)
jstewart@ccs.carleton.ca (John Stewart)
uunet.UU.NET!ccci!tcs (Terry Slattery)
henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)

Tom Perrine (tep)                       |Internet: tep@tots.Logicon.COM
Logicon                                 |UUCP: sun!suntan!tots!tep
Tactical and Training Systems Division  |
San Diego CA                            |GENIE: T.PERRINE
"Harried: with preschoolers"            |+1 619 455 1330