Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!lll-winken!uunet!timbuk!cs.umn.edu!sialis!orbit!zuhause!bruce From: bruce@zuhause.MN.ORG (Bruce Albrecht) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Commodore Research and Development. Message-ID: Date: 9 Jan 91 05:53:21 GMT References: <1991Jan3.003449.1@ccvax.iastate.edu> <600@tronsbox.xei.com> Lines: 20 >In article <600@tronsbox.xei.com> tron1@tronsbox.xei.com (Kenneth Jamieson) writes: > That seems to be pretty accurate. No one wants to hear >anything bad about this machine. I mean I >OWN< the machine and I am >intimidated by the ferver here! In this case, it's not that nobody wants to hear anything bad, as much as we're tired of seeing the same people post essentially the same complaints month after month after month. > > The RANGE of colors needs updating much more than the number >of lines of resolution does. I mean , 24 bit will be nice, but it >would be ok to just get a REAL set of 256 that has a full 8 bit range. I think most of us would agree that the Amiga could be improved in this area, but posting misinformation coupled with slams on Commodore management will not improve Barrett's case. -- bruce@zuhause.mn.org