Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!easy!lron From: lron@easy.hiam (Dwight Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Commodore Research and Development. Message-ID: <187e4f65.ARN097c@easy.hiam> Date: 9 Jan 91 02:30:45 GMT References: <41220@nigel.ee.udel.edu> Reply-To: lron@easy.hiam Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Organization: You must be talking about someone else. Lines: 33 Expires: Keywords: Distribution: In article <41220@nigel.ee.udel.edu>, Marc Barrett writes: > As for IBM, the mainframe market is totally dominated by IBM, precisely ^^^^^^^^^ Really, that's why they laid off all those personel that were on the production line for the 3090, give me a break IBM has been loosing ground in the mainframe market for quite a while. Why would a company buy an IBM mainframe when they can get a machine that's compatible with the IBM machine but faster, cost less and backed buy a well established company??? > because IBM spends quite a lot on R&D. IBM is one of the few U.S. The amount of money spent does not equate directly to the results, any company that would throw a fortune into developing a new OS for their PC systems when they could have obtained the rights to an OS that would do the same basic things is obviously not wisely spending their R&D $$$ wisely. > ALL research at Commodore is very short-term, precisely because > Commodore's managers are more worried about short-term profits then > long-term strength. Really, and how do you know what R&D projects are going on at Commodore?? or IBM or any other company. CDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDBDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD? 3 Dwight Hubbard 3 USENET : uunet!easy!lron 3 3 Kaneohe, Hawaii 3 GT-Power: 029/004 (lron) 3 3 3 CFR : 31:910/101 (Dwight Hubbard) 3 @DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDY