Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool2.mu.edu!think.com!mintaka!ogicse!unmvax!ddnvx1!ridout From: RIDOUT@ddnvx1.afwl.af.mil Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm Subject: Re: Telebit and Amigas Message-ID: <17026@ddnvx1.afwl.af.mil> Date: 14 Jan 91 11:37:16 GMT References: <1883f666.ARN07d3@postmod.UUCP> Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm Distribution: comp Lines: 33 In article <1883f666.ARN07d3@postmod.UUCP>, andrew@postmod.UUCP (Andrew J Richardson) writes: > In article , Jay Adelson writes: > > -> I think I am confused in that from what I understand the Telebit can > -> do the "standard" 9600 (I think it's called v.32?) as well as real > -> 19200 speed, whereas the Dual Standard HST modem does both standards > -> for 9600 and true 14400 speed. Seeing that a modem user would want to > -> have FASTER x-fer rates, wouldn't the Telebit go faster? Or is the > -> HST just as fast and perhaps faster than the telebit? > > the t2500 runs with the v.32 standard, giving 9600 bps capability. it also > runs with PEP, a proprietary protocol, giving up to 19200 bps operation. > other models offer variations on this, such as the trailblazer plus, which > offers the PEP protocol, but no v.32. all telebit modems fully implement > the slower protocols (v.22bis, bell 212a, v.22, bell 103). > > > ---andrew > > andrew@postmod.uucp > uunet!postmod!andrew I have been using a t2500 for a while now. It seams to work fine. Where I work the only high speed lines are PEP only. On my side of the line I talk to the modem at 19200, the other side operates at 9600, and my transfer speed is 1400 CPS on a good day 900 CPS on a bad one. I am using ZMODEM with PEP on and protocols off. -- **************************************************************************** * Brian Ridout Internet: ridout@ddnvx1.afwl.af.mil * * wl/scev * * Kirtland AFB NM 87117 My Apple is better than your Orange. * ****************************************************************************