Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!stjhmc!p88.f15.n300.z1.fidonet.org!Lawson.English
From: Lawson.English@p88.f15.n300.z1.fidonet.org (Lawson English)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: MacApp examples Was: Local/AppleTalk Connectivity in MacApp
Message-ID: <34585.278C73D7@stjhmc.fidonet.org>
Date: 8 Jan 91 19:05:01 GMT
Sender: ufgate@stjhmc.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:300/15.88 - Tucson Apple Core, Tucson AZ
Lines: 19

Kent Sandvik writes in a message to All

KS> The original thread in this discussion was why MacApp sample 
KS> code does not make use of isolated application class libraries. 
KS> I assume that the comment above is just a 'yes-it-is-bad' comment. 
KS> I tried to find some kind of a statement that contradicts the 
KS> earlier comments, alas did not find anything

Perhaps I jumped into the middle of a long-running thread and simply reiterated
someone else's post. However, my comment was directed at the idea that one should
make the application class "all-knowing" --that it was not necessary, even made
compile times excruciatingly slow.

Lawson
 

--  
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!300!15.88!Lawson.English
Internet: Lawson.English@p88.f15.n300.z1.fidonet.org