Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!unido!horga!freesid!watzman!wrkof!acwbust!andrew
From: andrew@acwbust.incom.de (Andrew Wheadon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: internal Telebit, SCO Unix 3.2, 80 bytes/sec???
Message-ID: <1991Jan5.083135.1007@acwbust.incom.de>
Date: 5 Jan 91 08:31:35 GMT
References: <24558@dime.cs.umass.edu>
Organization: Andrew Wheadon, 6140 Bensheim 4
Lines: 31

In article <24558@dime.cs.umass.edu> williams@cs.umass.edu writes:
>I just installed an internal Trailblazer Plus in my 486/25 clone running SCO
>
>I am calling SCO's sosco system for testing and the Systems entry is
>set to use the dialTBIT dialer with the speed set at 19200.  uutry
>reports CONNECT FAST, but the xferstats shows that I'm only getting
>76 bytes per second on large transfers!

You should be getting CONNECT FAST/UUCP if you want to have high transfer-
rates with uucp. See the dictionary in comp.dcom.modems on "spoofing"
Have you set S111=30 ? If yes then have SCO set S111=30 or S111=255
needed to get a uucp-g-protokoll-spoofing connection.

>
>What am I doing wrong?  Do I need to use the FAS driver instead of
>SCO's? 
I do not know how well SCO's driver works but if you start getting
errors (Which will be between Computer and Modem as the PEP connection
between Modem and Modem seems error-free to the software. Then you
should switch to a FAS driver.
> Do I need to initialize the modem (dialTBIT -z?) at powerup
>since it has no non-volatile ram?
Are you sure about this ? Is there no AT&W1 or AT&W2 command to save
your configuration ?

>
>Thanks for any help!
>Leo      c/o williams@cs.umass.edu     leo@aai.com

Hope it was some help and you hadn't already checked all these things
Bye Andrew            andrew@acwbust.incom.de