Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!midway!gargoyle!igloo!ddsw1!obdient!gagme!grahj From: grahj@gagme.chi.il.us (jim graham) Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix Subject: Re: Ultrix/X (more questions) Message-ID: <1007@gagme.chi.il.us> Date: 11 Jan 91 02:28:15 GMT References: <1991Jan7.114159@wsl.dec.com> Organization: GAGME - Public Access UNIX of Chicago, Illinois, USA, Earth Lines: 34 In article , bglenden@colobus.cv.nrao.edu (Brian Glendenning) writes: > >|> Also, using gcc vs cc made used to make dramatic differences on the >|> performance of MIT X on Suns, is the same true of the DEC RISC >|> machines (I have been using cc). Thanks again. This may be related to something I've noticed, and may not....but if anyone has the answer to this one, I'd really like to know it! I'm running Ultrix 4.0 on a vaxstation 3100, have not yet compiled MIT X11R4 (waiting for a big hard disk to come in...then I compile it), so I'm running the DEC server. However, I have compiled some of my favorite MIT versions of clients, some of which aren't even provided with Ultrix. Here's the problem. When I run twm (which I prefer greatly over dxwm!), it seems to have a serious negative impact on the performance of many applications. One that really shows this effect is "xlock -mode qix" --- the patterns are really slow and choppy..... Has anyone noticed this, and does anyone know what the problem/fix is? Please respond via direct email, as I sometimes don't beat the expiration on news here....I'll post a summary if anyone wants me to. Thanks, Jim Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Share and Enjoy! (Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, complaints division) 73, de n5ial TCP/IP: jim@n5ial.ampr.org --- 44.72.0.88 Packet: n5ial@wb9mjn (Chicago, IL USA) Internet: grahj@gagme.chi.il.us ------------------------------------------------------------------------------