Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!csn!news!grunwald
From: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu (Dirk Grunwald)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Rumours about "new" U*IX ?
Message-ID: <1991Jan15.000508.6138@csn.org>
Date: 15 Jan 91 00:05:08 GMT
References: <7179@tekgen.BV.TEK.COM> <1991Jan12.174914.26621@crl.dec.com>
	<1991Jan13.070816.24882@ircam.fr> <1991Jan13.130004.11673@crl.dec.com>
Sender: news@csn.org
Reply-To: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Lines: 5
In-Reply-To: jg@quabbin.crl.dec.com's message of 13 Jan 91 13:00:04 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: foobar.colorado.edu


I'd also like to point out that if you use optmization, the gcc hacked
by OSF appears to be as/more reliable than the 'cc' from MIPS, and it
does provide debugging support. It just produces slightly slower
executables.