Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stl!robobar!ronald
From: ronald@robobar.Co.Uk (Ronald S H Khoo)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: /etc/badtrk not big enough.
Message-ID: <9101101703.AA00832@robobar.Co.Uk>
Date: 10 Jan 91 17:03:54 GMT
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.1.1 5/02/90)
To: sco-list@uunet.uu.net
Cc: comp-unix-xenix-sco

Does a bigger /etc/badtrk than the one on N1-2.3.2f exist?
It's @(#) badtrk.c 1.20 88/07/01, 8086 binary and too small to
non-destructively scan the discs on our Compaq 25e's (39 sectors/track,
damn them).  Would it be reasonable to use a SCO Unix /etc/badtrk ?
Or will something horrible happen ?

Anyway, if someone's listening at SCO, please remember to put a bigger
/etc/badtrk on the 2.3.4 N1 diskette if you ever get around to releasing it.


-- 
ronald@robobar.co.uk +44 81 991 1142 (O) +44 71 229 7741 (H)