Xref: utzoo comp.lang.smalltalk:2519 comp.windows.ms.programmer:610
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!applix!scotte
From: scotte@applix.com (Scott Evernden)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Smalltalk V/Windows tbr Jan 15
Message-ID: <1109@applix.com>
Date: 14 Jan 91 14:52:20 GMT
References: <20654@netcom.UUCP> <1991Jan14.013737.2108@dhw68k.cts.com>
Reply-To: scotte@applix.UUCP (Scott Evernden)
Organization: APPLiX Inc., WestboroMA
Lines: 12

In article <1991Jan14.013737.2108@dhw68k.cts.com> daveegan@dhw68k.cts.com (Dave Egan) writes:
>... However, I believe Smalltalk won't generate a 
>standalone runtime whereas Actor does.

The very first bullet item on the Smalltalk /V Windows blurb I recently
received says: "Generates standalone applications".

Bullet 2 says "No runtime charges for distributing your applications".

This is quite different from that *other* Smalltalk...

-scott