Xref: utzoo comp.lang.smalltalk:2522 comp.windows.ms.programmer:614 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!extro!objtch From: objtch@extro.ucc.su.oz.au (Peter Goodall) Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Smalltalk V/Windows tbr Jan 15 Message-ID: Date: 14 Jan 91 20:04:34 GMT References: <20654@netcom.UUCP> <1991Jan14.013737.2108@dhw68k.cts.com> <1109@applix.com> Sender: news@metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU Organization: Sydney University Computing Service, Sydney, NSW, Australia Lines: 29 Nntp-Posting-Host: extro.ucc.su.oz.au scotte@applix.com (Scott Evernden) writes: >In article <1991Jan14.013737.2108@dhw68k.cts.com> daveegan@dhw68k.cts.com (Dave Egan) writes: >>... However, I believe Smalltalk won't generate a >>standalone runtime whereas Actor does. >The very first bullet item on the Smalltalk /V Windows blurb I recently >received says: "Generates standalone applications". >Bullet 2 says "No runtime charges for distributing your applications". >This is quite different from that *other* Smalltalk... >-scott If Smalltalk V for windows is much like V1.2 for PM we now have the eqivalent of separately compilable modules. You can actually create DLLs independant of your Smalltalk image, which you can distribute to other Smalltalkers as toolkits. ---------------------------- Peter Goodall Smalltalk Systems Consultant ObjecTech P/L 162 Burns Bay Rd, LANE COVE , NSW, AUSTRALIA objtch@extro.ucc.su.oz.au