Xref: utzoo comp.lang.smalltalk:2526 comp.windows.ms.programmer:621 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod!caen!umich!vela!rdthomps From: rdthomps@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Robert D. Thompson) Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: Smalltalk V/Windows tbr Jan 15 Message-ID: <4677@vela.acs.oakland.edu> Date: 15 Jan 91 02:02:37 GMT References: <14019113:19:59KRW1@lehigh.bitnet> Reply-To: rdthomps@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Robert D. Thompson) Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI Lines: 56 All of you may want to know that there is another OOPS on the block, Object/1 (available for OS/2 PM, and soon Windows 3.0) (and it also generates stand-alone executables) Many of you have probably heard of it, or read reviews. I am beta testing the product right now, it is looking pretty good. As one who has been developing in Actor and Smalltalk for some time now, Object/1 goes a long way to include a rich and numerous set of classes. Most importantly, Object/1 interfaces to several major database systems, including SQL-Server, MDBSIV, and it even has its own DLL (TBL) database engine and associated classes. It includes a Forms-Painter that automatically generates classes from dialog designs. It also contains extensive DDE classes. ALL OF THIS IN THE BASE PACKAGE. I don't hate Actor or Smalltalk at all, I like them. However, I cannot, time after time, buy additional packages to get advanced classes (e.g. Goodies, Actor Resource Kit) Anyway, I just thought I would let everyone know that they should check out ALL OOPS before making a decision. ACTOR, SMALLTALK, AND OBJECT/1 ARE ALL GOOD IN MY OPINION. What's nice, is that the competition is heating up and thus the quality. Here stops the ramblin...hope this helps somebody! :-{ ^^^ (J.P.) P.S. For info. on Object/1 PM or the release date of Object/1 for Windows contact, Greg Fletcher mdbs PO Box 248 Lafayette, Indiana 47902 (317) 463-2581 FAX (317) 448-6428 Tell them I sent ya - it's worth a try.