Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!ucla-cs!news From: ARJ91%GENESEO.BITNET@mvs.oac.ucla.edu Newsgroups: sci.med.aids Subject: RE: (2882) RE: HIV as genetic weapon Message-ID: <1991Jan10.235307.499@cs.ucla.edu> Date: 10 Jan 91 15:53:00 GMT Sender: news@cs.ucla.edu (Mr. News) Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department Lines: 25 Approved: phil@wubios.wustl.edu Note: non-commercial reproduction. Nntp-Posting-Host: squid.cs.ucla.edu Archive-Number: 2886 My background is in medicine and I am familiar with the literature on the origins and spread of HIV. For anyone who wants to know what the scientific community knows about these topics there is an excellent summary and bibliography in Nature, vol 348, 13 December 1990, p. 578, entitled "Origin and Spread of AIDS," by A. Karpas, of the Dept. of Haematology, Cambridge University. A summary: the first know case was the death of a British sailor, and later, a Norweigin sailor, in 1959 and 1960, respectively. The origins of HIV are traced to African monkeys with a related lentivirus, the first of which was isolated from a macaque. A plasusible explanation for the transfer of HIV to humans was propsed in 1987 by Noireau, and is well considered by some circles: it has been noted that members of the Idjwi tribe in East Zaire would spread blood from freshly killed monkeys on the male and female genital regions to stimulate intense sexual activity. It is believed that that the later introduction of syringe based innoculations (with syringes being widely reused) was able to foster the spread of HIV from isolated populations, etc. As a final note I would suggest a little bit of informal study on HIV, viral infections, retroviruses, etc. to anyone who seriously believes the "conspiracy theory accts. heretofore presented. Even that which appear in Randy Shilts book would be helpfel in identifying some of the rather large gaps in the theories that are being proposed. alex