Path: utzoo!utgpu!canet-d-owner
Newsgroups: can.canet.d
Path: utzoo!utgpu!mcr
From: mcr@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca (Michael Richardson)
Subject: Re: Low speed connections? Class B service...
Message-ID: <1991Jan18.173544.23248@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca>
Organization: Sandelman Software Works, Debugging Department, Ottawa, ON
References: <1991Jan17.203627.16619@Latour.Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca> <1991Jan18.041014.20159@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Distribution: can
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 1991 12:35:44 -0500
Apparently-To: canet-d@canet.ca
Original-To: canet.ca!canet-d@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca
Newsgroups: can.canet.d
Distribution: can
Sender: postmaster@utcs.utoronto.ca
Approved: postmaster@utcs.utoronto.ca
Lines:       21

In article <1991Jan18.041014.20159@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> molnar@Bisco.CAnet.CA (Tom Molnar) writes:
>In article <1991Jan17.203627.16619@Latour.Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca> mcr@Sandelman.OCUnix.On.Ca (Michael Richardson) writes:
>Could you expand on the context?  The current CA*net backbone model

  I'm sorry, I guess this should be directed at the ONet folks. I
forget that Onet != CA*net. 

>to the network and the customer.  I've been told that BCnet, for
>example, offers a wide range of connection alternatives which includes
>economical dialup SLIP connections.

  I was not entirely aware of this. I was under the impression that
ONet's reticence was due to restrictions placed on it from a higher
level organsation.


-- 
   :!mcr!:            |  The postmaster never | - Pay attention only
   Michael Richardson |    resolves twice.    | to _MY_ opinions. -  
 HOME: mcr@sandelman.ocunix.on.ca +   Small Ottawa nodes contact me
 Bell: (613) 237-5629             +    about joining ocunix.on.ca!