Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool2.mu.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!dweasel!loren From: loren@dweasel.llnl.gov (Loren Petrich) Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy Subject: Re: Minds, machines, and Godel Message-ID: <89586@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> Date: 16 Jan 91 22:45:47 GMT References: <1991Jan16.035058.7465@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <28087@cs.yale.edu> Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV Organization: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Lines: 38 Nntp-Posting-Host: dweasel.llnl.gov I am not impressed with the claim that Go"del's theorem indicates that there are things that we can think about that a computer cannot. For the following reason. Consider that Go"del's theorem is for any formal system in which statement can refer to themselves. The theorem states that there will exist a statement G that states: "G is not a theorem". Though true, it cannot be shown to be true inside the system. All that is necessary is the ability to make self-references. Go"del's theorem is simply a fancy version of the Liar Paradox. If "I am lying" is true, then it must be false. If it is false, then it must be true. Ad infinitum. There is a psychological version of Go"del's theorem, which makes no assumptions about the nature of the human mind. Consider this statement: I am incapable of judging the correctness of this statement While it is certainly true, one will not be able to work it out directly. Because if one was able to do so, that would imply that one was not. I myself am able to discuss this by psychological indirection, involving my ability to analyze my own thought. So that is why I think that Go"del's theorem makes no limitation on computers that we do not share, because one can always set up a psychological version of the statement G mentioned earlier. Any comments? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Loren Petrich, the Master Blaster: loren@sunlight.llnl.gov Since this nodename is not widely known, you may have to try: loren%sunlight.llnl.gov@star.stanford.edu What do you MEAN it's not in the computer?!? -- Madonna